A Role for Authority Supervision in Impact Assessment? Examples from Finnish EIA Reviews

Authors

  • Lovisa Solbär Department of Geography and Economic History, Umeå University
  • E. Carina H. Keskitalo Department of Geography and Economic History, Umeå University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v8.661

Abstract

With the boom in mining in Fennoscandia, reconciliation of competing land use interests in governance procedures such as impact assessment has come to the fore. One of the functions that has been applied to varying degrees in national frameworks is supervision of the procedure by a responsible authority. This paper examines review statements issued in the context of mining project assessments in northern Finland – one of the countries implementing authority supervision. The study shows that third-party review may play a role in highlighting the importance of competing land use interest such as reindeer herding. Attention to such interests, however, remains limited by the application of spatial planning in the case and by consent processing, up until the end of the period examined. Among the lessons for impact assessment is the need for methodologies for accommodating anticipatory types of (practice-based and non-scientific) information. Unless these types of sources are considered valid, the possibility of substantializing anticipation and finding solutions along those lines will be missed, with the risk of making things on the ground worse before the need for mitigation measures is comprehended in the face of materializing impacts.

(Published: May 2017)

Citation: L. Solbär & E. Carina H. Keskitalo. “A Role for Authority Supervision in Impact Assessment? Examples from Finnish EIA Reviews.” Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol. 8, 2017, pp. 52–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v8.661

Read the full version
Usage Statistics
Total downloads:
Download data is not yet available.

Full text

Published

2017-05-27

How to Cite

Solbär, L., & Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2017). A Role for Authority Supervision in Impact Assessment? Examples from Finnish EIA Reviews. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 8. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v8.661

Issue

Vol. 8 (2017)

Section

Original Articles

Keywords:

environmental assessment, EIA, SIA, mining, reindeer husbandry, Finland

License

Authors contributing to The Arctic Review on Law and Politics retain copyright to their articles but agree to publish them under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License. The terms of this license permit third parties to freely copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to adapt, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. The foregoing may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the third party or their use.