A reply to calls for an extension of the definition of Sámi in Finland
In Finland the legal definition of the indigenous Sámi has been debated heatedly for years and more recently it has entered academic circles. Some scholars submit that the current law-based definition in Finland is all too narrow, and argue that there should be more emphasis on self-identification by the individual. Further claims state that the ILO Convention No. 169 identifies the subjects of the Convention, also on an individual level; wherefore it follows from the Convention which individuals in Finland are Sámi. The present article analyses these arguments critically and establishes certain legal parameters that the discussion on Sámi definition needs to follow in order to comply with international law, and especially indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination.
Keywords: Sámi rights, Sámi definition, ILO Convention No. 169, indigenous peoples’ self-determination, Sámi in Finland.
Citation: Arctic Review on Law and Politics, vol. 5, 1/2014 pp. 123–143. ISSN 1891-6252
Authors contributing to The Arctic Review on Law and Politics retain copyright to their articles but agree to publish them under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. The terms of this license permit third parties to freely copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to adapt, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose – except commercial purposes – as long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. The foregoing may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the third party or their use.