Russia’s Ambivalent Status-Quo/Revisionist Policies in the Arctic

  • Pavel Baev Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)

Abstract

Russia has been following an Arctic policy that is highly heterogeneous, combining efforts at preserving cooperation with Western neighbors with commitment to building up its own strength. Three distinct policy modes can be identified: realist/militaristic, institutional/cooperative, and diplomatic management. Each mode is based on a particular interpretation of Russia’s various interests in the High North/Arctic: nuclear/strategic, geopolitical, economic/energy-related, and symbolic. Examination of policy modes and interests shows that each combination contains some elements that focus on preserving the status quo in the Arctic, while other elements push for changes in Russia’s favor. This article finds that revisionist elements have been gaining in strength, but that current policy still attaches high value to sustaining traditional patterns, even if they demand more resources and provide fewer advantages and revenues.

Usage Statistics
Total downloads:
Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pavel Baev, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)

Research Professor

Published
2018-12-19
Section
Original Articles
How to Cite
BAEV, Pavel. Russia’s Ambivalent Status-Quo/Revisionist Policies in the Arctic. Arctic Review, [S.l.], v. 9, p. 408-424, dec. 2018. ISSN 2387-4562. Available at: <https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/1336>. Date accessed: 23 jan. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v9.1336.
Keywords
Russia, Arctic, security, militarization, revisionism, geopolitics, energy cooperation, Northern Sea Route, status quo policies