Testing the Limits of Jurisdiction in Investor-State Arbitration in Svalbard’s Waters: Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway

Authors

  • Valentin Schatz University of Hamburg, Germany
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v12.3372

Abstract

On 1 April 2020, the Latvian fishing company SIA North Star and its owner Peteris Pildegovics initiated an investor-State arbitration against Norway (Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway) at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). This case is not only Norway’s first ever ICSID case, but also the first publicly known investor-State arbitration in which an operator of a fishing vessel has brought a claim against a coastal State for allegedly unlawful exercise of prescriptive and enforcement jurisdiction in relation to fisheries. The case raises intricate questions concerning the limits of jurisdiction ratione materiae and jurisdiction ratione personae of investment tribunals.

Usage Statistics
Total downloads:
Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-08-25

How to Cite

Schatz, V. (2021). Testing the Limits of Jurisdiction in Investor-State Arbitration in Svalbard’s Waters: Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 12, 167–171. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v12.3372

Issue

Section

Debates on Arctic Law and Politics